The initial opinion of the ISA on my method

Dear readers, from the International Patent Office (in particular ISA) came out with the statement that my method is contrary to the second law of thermodynamics - "However, according to the second law of thermodynamics perpetual motion machine of the second kind is impossible, namely it is impossible to apply a heat engine whose only result of the action is the conversion of the heat of any substance in the work without the transfer of the heat to other substances.
Accordingly, the devices for converting the thermal energy into mechanical energy and methods for conversion of thermal energy into mechanical energy according to claims 1-6, 8, 9, 10 contrary to the second law of thermodynamics."
Will naturally object as follows:
I want to draw attention of the committee that my unit is heat insulated, and as its elements are insulated. So all evaporators (3) of the thermodynamic point of view appear different and independent of each other bodies, different and independent of each other thermodynamic systems .In the description I have examined the method with pre-established temperature difference between the evaporators - the first (3a) have a ambient temperature, and in any subsequent decrease in the temperature close to the boiling point of the working substance. So in this method and device have the transfer of heat from one body to another. The gases coming out of the transducers of thermal energy into mechanical energy heat exchange with the evaporators back in the chain - transfer heat to other substances (the substance is the same working substance , but with a lower temperature, which in thermodynamic aspect we can consider them - other substance). Also working substance of the system for redistributing heat contact with evaporators (with various bodies from a thermodynamic point of view) through heat exchangers so that I have "heat transfer to other substances" - as they expressed by the Commission. Substance - working substance of the unit in each insulated evaporator is "other" from the thermodynamic point of view because there are different temperatures.
When I want to use environmental heat energy required to drive the device I said that must be cool first cold part to a temperature near the boiling point of the working substance. In the description examines the processes set in already operating temperature - the temperature decreases in each evaporator from temperature of the environment in the first (3a) to the boiling point of the working substance in the last (3x). I previously created a "different bodyes" from a thermodynamic point of view, so that we can transfer heat to the "other body". This will allow me to convert heat into mechanical energy. Thus most - correct and important to me formulation of the second law of thermodynamics made by Carnot: " The heat can be converted to work only when there is a temperature difference. Of the total heat is utilized only part of it and this part depends on the temperature difference " is "taken into account ".
To emphasize once again:
1 The gaseous working substance heat exchange through heat exchangers(5; 18) with different from thermodynamic perspective bodies - evaporators
2 The working substance of the system for redistributing heat is in contact with various bodies -  evaporators and heat exchangers transfer heat from one body to another through heat exchangers(16)
3 Cold part I create - using an external force (starter 24) cooling the cold part to a temperature near the boiling point of the working substance. This will have available "different bodyes" - each insulated evaporator, with which gaseous working substance of the unit to heat exchange.

Let readers who examined my method to share the opinion - Is it right an opinion of the ISA or it is not correct. I take the liberty to paraphrase: "will be, or will not be" IoI

Thoughts on the subject - an internal cooling engine

When we use the warmth of the heater power source to power my engine is better to be well insulated from the environment and the connection of the unit with external heat exchanger and heat exchanger itself. So all the heat we can "catch" from the heater can turn into mechanical energy - ideally will have no heat losses due to heat exchange with the environment. In this way we can use a working substance having a boiling point higher than ambient temperature (e.g. 373K water BP. At ambient temperature  290K water is in the liquid state). Then with heater will heat up substance to a temperature higher than its boiling point . Initially, we will have a cold part at a temperature equal to the environment, but gradually cold part to warm to a temperature close to the boiling point of the working substance (water 373K). Depending on the temperature that we have achieved in the external heat exchanger by heating will have a temperature difference between the hot and cold part of the unit. If I heat the water to 600K will have available temperature difference of 227 degrees between the hot and cold part to be able to convert the heat from the heater into mechanical energy. Bearing in mind that the use of a closed cycle working substance heat starts at the boiling point (about 373K of water) and not by the ambient temperature (say 290K) which increases the efficiency of the unit.

Thoughts on the topic - internal cooling engine

When the method for converting heat into mechanical energy using the heat of the environment ("free heat") will have to "pay" for cooling. Nature will heated liquid working substance having a boiling point lower than ambient temperature (e.g. ammonia  - 240K BP). So working substance will be under pressure to evaporate in the unit. In this must have a closed cycle of working substance to our "remain profitable" mechanical energy. "Profit" - mechanical energy  will be possible   when we will "pay" less for cooling than of all the energy of the a given amount of working substance. For each configuration of my unit exists flow on pumps (and it will not be zero), where cooling is enough "cheap" for us to remain "profit" mechanical energy.

Thoughts on the topic

If I charge the unit with a working substance R32 (or R23 as to find durable materials at low temperature to make the unit), chilled cold part to its boiling point- 220K (190K), I could have turned the heat of the atmosphere at a temperature of 260 - 270K into mechanical energy. I will have available some 40-50 (70-80) degrees temperature difference between the hot and cold part that will allow me to convert heat from the atmosphere into mechanical energy.This will not eject CO2 - I'll need energy just to cool the cold part of the unit initially.